Originally posted by Kid A
Almost all my games are pirated; my only original games are FF7, 8 and 9 for the PSX, and Anachronox for PC. Sorry... It's not that I support piracy... it's only that I don't feel like spending ~30 euros in a videogame... Of course it is very cool to have the original CD, with its beautiful manual and all of that... but I cannot afford it, man!! All my music CD's are original though...
a matter of preference. It depends a lot on how much you like a product. Example: I'm a NFS freak, from NFS2 I have the normal, SE AND psx version (last one was a bargain though). Why? because I really like the series, and that's definately something that comes into play. You see, I wouldnt do that for most other games

.
There's also software, or music, that you like, but not a lot; that is, not enough to shell out say, 30 euros for (btw most videogames I know are more expensive than that, sadly :/). So, you could either not buy it or copy it because you wouldnt buy it anyways. While strictly spoken thats not legal, it doesnt hurt sales at all. You probably value the music you buy more than the games you play.
Piracy, while in it roots may be a black & white thing, actually isnt when you look further.
We have a person called "Gamer X". Gamer X wants to buy a psx but finds it (and the games) too expensive, so he doesnt. He learns of a mod chip but thats illegal so he still doesnt.
Now comes his friend, called "Gamer Y". Gamer Y wants to buy a psx but finds it (and the games) too expensive, so he doesnt. Then he learns about the phenomenon called "mod chip". So he buys the psx, mod chip, quite a few games as well, but also copies a number of them. In the process he buys a number of cd-r's and also had to replace his crappy cd burner with a better one.
Now, of course, if we strictly follow our laws, Gamer X was right and Gamer Y was wrong.
But I really doubt who the game companies would like better. Gamer X, because he was such a nice lad who followed the law or Gamer Y, who maybe made a bunch of pirate copies but they made money thanks to him, and besides, the cd-r company got a nice amount of money too
Now we take a third person, "Gamer Z". Gamer Z buys a modded psx, a burner, rents/borrows huge amounts of games, copies them and sells them, making profit. Now no doubt the game companies definately wouldnt like him. The manufacturers of cd-r's would prolly hug him tho
Gamer Z's definately cause mayor losses for game manufacturers. Gamer Y's would probably leave the market pretty stable. Gamer X's would create an Utopia but the economy might collapse though.
Btw, it brings me to another point; if no-one would pirate, no CD burners would be sold. Not much at least, because backups really arent THAT important to most people. Same for cd-r's. See, and by the way, isnt it funny that Sony themselves sell equipment that's suited to copy their own stuff with? Quite funny if you ask me. See, in a way companies support it themselves. They would like you to buy games and consoles and cd-r's but only use it like they want it. While in the meantime you also pay a lot for your broadband internet connection which of course you may only use for email and a little bit of browsing. And do you honestly think, that everybody will just follow in those steps? of course not. Believe me, they rather have people buying stuff and copying a bit than people not buying at all, because THAT would be a REAL problem.