I don't know.... Usually those kind of threads are closed pretty fast...... Since they alomost always end up as "Fix this game! Fix my favorite game! Fix this game or I sue you!" )

Also, I don't think the devs would like any feature requests for the emulator at the moment.....

 

wtf, i swear i replied to this?

anyway, answer is no, cos it will just be filled with silly requests. The beta discussion thread is already pushing its luck, we dont want one that blatantly steps over the line.

 

actually, i thought the beta thread would have been closed by now....i guess Mkilbride2588, Hockland, and theyre gang scared off all the n00bs.

 

lol yay I`m scaring off the noobs

Though I`m usually only telling off the piracy people. I like to think I`m being helpful to the rest .

 

is there any alternative and better method than virtual memory method

the following is just a guess
i think
virtual memory is related to hard disk more than memory
so will making pcsx2 totally depend on ram offer any benefits?

 

You're confused, the "virtual" memory used by PCSX2 isn't the virtual memory isn't the Windows one but it creates it's own using the RAM for emulating the PS2. So it's as fast as it is.

 

the following is just a guess:
i think virtual memory is related to hard disk more than memory
so will making pcsx2 totally depend on ram offer any benefits?

The assumption is not correct. Actual developpers would know better anyway, so it's not like "user-contributed feature requests" would do much if anything other than repeat the same requests over and over.