at those level of details my 9100 pci hovers at 10-17 fps lolz, but at 640x480 the game is solid at 30 fps and above with details and texture on
zerocopy
- Status
Malcolm...you can't mention crap like that around here...you aren't allowed to discuss warez of any kind...sorry
Pro:
-Mouse+KB will be liked by FPS'ers who liked xBox Halo but not a gamepad
-Adjustable resolution (looks nice in 1280x1024)
-Some multiplayer maps are specific for PC, designed to take advantage of a PC
Con:
-No Co-Op, promised in a later mod/patch
-Brutal on system resources, massive slowdowns on high-end hardware - Plan on using a low res
-No Co-Op
-Does not offer much past what existing PC FPS's offer
-No Co-Op
Halo is almost Quake3, almost UT, almost Tribes, and almost Half-Life. But it doesn't meet or exceed any of these.
-Mouse+KB will be liked by FPS'ers who liked xBox Halo but not a gamepad
-Adjustable resolution (looks nice in 1280x1024)
-Some multiplayer maps are specific for PC, designed to take advantage of a PC
Con:
-No Co-Op, promised in a later mod/patch
-Brutal on system resources, massive slowdowns on high-end hardware - Plan on using a low res
-No Co-Op
-Does not offer much past what existing PC FPS's offer
-No Co-Op
Halo is almost Quake3, almost UT, almost Tribes, and almost Half-Life. But it doesn't meet or exceed any of these.
hell yeah dude. there have been crazy times with 4-8 player games with my friends...
i only wish you could play this on LAN with an xbox....when my xbox owning friends come up from college, that would be kickass....
i wonder if they will make something for Xbox to PC connection. they already have one for Tony hawk 4, you can play with PS2 and PC
i only wish you could play this on LAN with an xbox....when my xbox owning friends come up from college, that would be kickass....
i wonder if they will make something for Xbox to PC connection. they already have one for Tony hawk 4, you can play with PS2 and PC
well i was waiting till thuesday to post shots but if zerocopy is alowed than so am i ^^
halo running a my 1.7 ghz 768 SDram with a Gefroce 2 MX/MX440
on 1024X768
i had to update gefroce and install DX9b
il post some 800x600 l8ter
halo running a my 1.7 ghz 768 SDram with a Gefroce 2 MX/MX440
on 1024X768
i had to update gefroce and install DX9b
il post some 800x600 l8ter
I've tried it without Pixel Shaders, with PS1.1, and PS2.0, without PS, it looks like ****, and with 1.1 and 2.0 it looks almost exactly the same except PS2.0 is as slow as my grandma, tells me that, finally, thz whole fuss about PS2.0 on nVidia cards is kinda useless, since PS2.0 brings only a minimal quality increase, for quite a huge speed loss.
No comment
Date / Time: 27.09.2003 12:51:46 (5819359ms)
3100MHz, 1024MB, 256M nVidia GeForceFX 5600 (DeviceID=0x0312) Driver=6.14.10.4523 Shader=2.0
C:\Programme\Microsoft Games\Halo\halo.exe -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)
Frames=4700
Total Time=252.72s
Average frame rate=18.60fps
(this was 1024X768 with full details enabled and with PS 2.0 im using PS 1.1 now which is giving accaptable results)
Date / Time: 27.09.2003 12:51:46 (5819359ms)
3100MHz, 1024MB, 256M nVidia GeForceFX 5600 (DeviceID=0x0312) Driver=6.14.10.4523 Shader=2.0
C:\Programme\Microsoft Games\Halo\halo.exe -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)
Frames=4700
Total Time=252.72s
Average frame rate=18.60fps
(this was 1024X768 with full details enabled and with PS 2.0 im using PS 1.1 now which is giving accaptable results)
- Status
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
