Next Generation Emulation banner
1 - 20 of 22 Posts

RealityX

· I'm cool.
Joined
·
131 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
If you're here, can you please post a pic of your donfiguration with Pete's DX6 plugin your matrox card, i remember last year you posted it but I reformated my HDD and lost all the info :(
 
Enigma still shows up from time to time. Maybe, if you are lucky, he will see this message and respond. But since you are looking for help w/your Matrox Card, I'lll be moving this thread to Hardware, where it really should be.
sincerely,
sx/amiga
 
No, I don't think there is a way to view it any more. That link is to psxemu.com and that doesn't exist any more. You might try asking Bobbi in PM if he could possibly help in some way. Sorry, that is the best I can tell you.
sincerely,
sx/amiga
 
He's in college at this time. And he actually studies too, so I don't think he's on the net at this time.

But then again, he and Ryos are big Ragnarok fans.... try asking Ryos if he's seen enigma around in Ragnarok. :p In the meantime, just play around with the settings. You never know when you might hit the right config for you. :)
 
Whats the big deal in configuring the pete's plugins....try checking out my website for the reviews, maybe they would help you a bit...other wise.....give some precise configurations of your hardware and maybe I would be a little helpful....!

Ali
 
It's a Matrox G400. it IS pretty hard to hit the right config for these kinds of cards. Your configs are mostly GeForce-optimized.
 
The Matrox G400 configuration are quite close to the one for that of TNT 1, all that matrox g400 would not do good would be the filtering modes, therefore those will be kept diabled, just like TNT2, also Blending options won't be working good either, why I am saying that cause my friend has a Maxtor.;)


Ali
 
Originally posted by Ali
The Matrox G400 configuration are quite close to the one for that of TNT 1, all that matrox g400 would do good would be the filtering modes, therefore those will be kept diabled, just like TNT2, also Blending options won't be working good either, why I am saying that cause my friend has a Maxtor.;)


Ali
Maxtor makes hard drives. And I really wouldn't compare the G400 to a TNT1.
 
Yeah sorry for that "Matrox"...well different people have different point if views so I won't be discussing anymore of that....! specially here...!

Ali
 
I expected a stupid answer like that from you anyway.

From http://www.3dspotlight.com/reviews/hardware/millennium_g400/g400-2.shtml

Here are the different configurations of Matrox G400 based cards: Retail Products

Display Features

SGRAM Memory

RAMDAC

Millennium G400
(G4+MDHA16GR)
DualHead
16MB
300 MHz

Millennium G400
(G4+MDHA32GR)
DualHead
32MB
300 MHz

Millennium G400 MAX
(G4+MMDHA32GR)
DualHead
32MB
360 MHz



As you can see there aren’t any products with the Mystique brand name, instead Matrox has decided to ship two different versions of the Millennium. The difference with the MAX version is that this one uses better cooling, faster memory and the core is clocked higher so that higher performance can be achieved, pretty much the same as TNT2 and TNT2 ULTRA cards.


Performance
I did a lot of benchmarking with the Millennium G400 card, and using the latest drivers and the OpenGL beta ICD which should improve performance a bit in games like Quake 2. I saw the card was performing somewhere between a TNT2 and a TNT2 Ultra card, but that wasn’t in all applications.

I mean, in some games the performance was much better than a TNT2 and maybe on par with a TNT2 Ultra but in some others it was way behind.

I really think the problem is drivers related, you might remember when Brian Hook from id Software made some benchmarking with the Quake 3 Test and the G400/G400 MAX cards were performing incredibly well in 1600x1200 resolutions (beating TNT2s Ultra) but just ok in 800x600 and other low resolutions.

From the 1600 benchmark results we can say the G400 chip has got a lot of raw power but since the drivers aren’t as optimized as they should in low resolutions they fall behind. For more detailed performance numbers see the benchmarks in the next pages.

Anyway, although G400s performance isn’t the best out there it has got some unique features for both gamers and professionals that are definitely worth a look.
 
Originally posted by Shiori
I expected a stupid answer like that from you anyway.

I mean, in some games the performance was much better than a TNT2 and maybe on par with a TNT2 Ultra but in some others it was way behind
Maybe you were stupid enough for not reading one of your own quotes...and yes I have seen articles of Matrox before so there is no need to teach me....!

If you for one instance you forget the clock speeds and you look how this card performs in practical....then you point of views will change to hell..!....I don't mean to be rude here but I am defending what my quote was ( and it is based on practical rather then wordly articles, if I had a digital camera I should have shown you some pictures of the card, which my friend has ) and it is quite accurate....approximately......!

Ali
 
Originally posted by Ali
Maybe you were stupid enough for not reading one of your own quotes...and yes I have seen articles of Matrox before so there is no need to teach me....!
[edit]

It is pointless to debate with idiots who don't have a friggin' clue what they're talking about anyway.
 
Shiori....look at the thread in the Test Spam.....! you will know whats going on
Ali
 
oh please forgive me the pain....solve this issue with me please....it is a request.....!.

And you point is? a million dollar question........you have been a pain in the ass for about two months I want to take some pills....justfy yourself why you bug me in the testspam section atonce....!

Ali
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts