[stegsy]

Like the title says. Just letting you guys know.

 

[ChronoBodi]

huh? that is never true... 64 bit will always be faster than 32 bit, unless you meant something specifically. What Settings? Why you say 32 bit is faster?

 

[sl1nk3]

Like the title says. Just letting you guys know.

I don't think so

 

[Gareth1977]

Are you talking about a specific game, or the emulator in general?

 

[nunito]

if you have two versions of both 32 and 64bit on the same system
operational. (xp vs xp , vista vs vista or win7 vs win7)
You can verify that what you say is totally false.
with the latest drivers and configuration. 64bits version is
slightly better

 

[stegsy]

I'm talking about the emulator specifically. Using rev 4525 on windows 7 x86 is faster for me (a lot faster) than x64 builds. It has been for me for the last few revisions, or at least since i started trying out x86 builds again.

 

[indecisive985]

how are you trying out x64 builds on x86 win 7?
for me, there is no real difference in speed.

 

[KrossX]

I think he ment: "Using rev 4525 on windows 7, x86 is faster for me (a lot faster) than x64 builds."

 

[stegsy]

I dont have time at the moment to try out specific revisions cause im at uni but when i do ill post some screenshots

 

[lostdejavu]

I have XP SP3 x86 and Win 7 7600 x64 and Win7 x64 has better speed in all revisions

 

[nosound.97]

I've got x64 version to work A LOT faster than x86, I've got full speed on Brawl with 4 players unlike x86, where I kept getting 40-45 FPS

 

[KrossX]

Windows7, tested Zelda Wind Waker for GC with rev4597 nonIL.
With the 32bits version, there's a point with some slowdown that gives me ~25/30 FPS.
With the 64bits version, the same point gives me ~28/30 FPS.

 

[oslash]

thats true

but only on orleans's IL builds