Next Generation Emulation banner

ATI Rage 128 gl 16mb or the Nvidia TNT2 M64 (16mb)

  • ATI Rage 128 gl 16mb

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • Nvidia TNT2 M64 (16mb)

    Votes: 7 70.0%

  • Total voters
    10
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
old-timer
Joined
·
1,330 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I've got both, and don't know which to put into the second computer... :eyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,830 Posts
I always thought the TNT2 64 had 64Mb, but I guess that doesn't make sense because my TNT2 ultra has 32Mb.
I guess my vote is for the TNT2, but I have no idea what the other card is like so I'm not really voting.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21 Posts
My brother had an ATI rage card in his computer.
It sucks, don't even think about it.

TNT-2 is pretty good though (if ye haven't got any better;) )
 
C

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
The TNT2 M64 is severely bandwidth-limited, worse than a vanillla TNT2, or a TNT2 Ultra.

It's performance is still better than the Rage, however.
 

·
old-timer
Joined
·
1,330 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
thanks for the responses guys. the tnt2 m64 was the one i put in, but i just wanted to be sure. thanx again.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
171 Posts
if you want my opinion the ati rage 128 is a 128 bit card (processor is 128 bits of band width but the tnt2 is 64 bit width so i think that the ati must be more powerful than the tnt2 at least a little bit .
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
345 Posts
i have the ati rage 128 but with 32 Mb of ram
It runs just fine although if i had the money, i would have gotten a geforce2 or some other high end card.

I have never seen a tnt2 64 running so i have no comparison

although since you have both, the best way to find out is to test them both and see wich one runs better
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
356 Posts
Yeah that's a good idea... try using Matrox-G100 (4Mb) with the 2000 version...
aaaah! nice transpatterny! nice speed! AAAAARRRRGGHH! :mad:
 

·
old-timer
Joined
·
1,330 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
good idea, i think i'll try it out.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top