last longer than I expected for a not name brand monitor 
I own a viewsonic X, 20.1" from 2008 a really nice monitor , but I don't have the 120hz ones
I own a viewsonic X, 20.1" from 2008 a really nice monitor , but I don't have the 120hz ones
Viewsonic has been around for many years.I haven't heard about that brand ViewSonic, but it looks good.
Ouch...but that's what you get for a Soyo :evil:Starting making a clicking noise, so i looked it up, its most likely an electric arc inside caused by too much humidity, now my monitor is flickering and its pretty much dying.
Its a Soyo 24inch, 2 years old. I dont recommend buying one now, though i think Soyo is out of business now lol.
But its given me a good reason to step up to a new viewsonic 22inch
Newegg.com - ViewSonic X Series VX2265wm Black 22" 3ms 120Hz 3D Ready Widescreen LCD Monitor 300 cd/m2 1000:1 - LCD Monitors
120hz babybeen looking forward to one of these for a few years now hehe. im a sucker for high fps.
already know mine supports true 8bitSo? That's like saying alot of LCD monitors that claim 32-bit color support is a gimmick since the 6-bit TN panels most of them are (especially outside the professional range) don't truly support the full 16.7 million colors, but rather only 262 thousand (18-bit) offhand, and then faking most of the rest of the color range up to 16.2 million (not even the full 16.7 million) via dithering and/or frame rate control techniques.
Yes, it's a gimmick, but I suppose "240Hz is 240Hz" just like "32-bit support is the 16.7 million colors it requires".
As for directly responding about the 120Hz versus 60Hz, I've heard there's no real difference to most people concerning fluidity, but that was based on response for televisions. For monitors, one area (even if it's the only) you will notice it is that it let's you have 120 FPS in games (and again, even if it's the only one, that one alone makes it worth it). I say go for the 120Hz one for sure (unless the cost is driven way up for it, which it doesn't seem to be). Oh, and if ViewSonic is still anywhere near as good as they were in the CRT days, that should be a good monitor. Had I not gotten my current IBM, a ViewSonic was the next in line.
thats a different thing all toghether. theres Perceptual FPs and theres Variable FPS. Play a n64 game at 20fps, and you won't see it lag at all.i can notice a distinct difference from 60 hz and 75 hz, cant imagine 60 to 120 lol. Right now im using my old dell 17 inch that has 75hz.
I dont get where this theory came from that people cant detect framerates above 30 or whatever. Play a fricken game at 30 then play it at 60, you will notice a difference.
Didn't Soyo used to make good motherboards.Ouch...but that's what you get for a Soyo :evil:
....
Same thing goes for playing a game at 60, and then playing it at 120.I dont get where this theory came from that people cant detect framerates above 30 or whatever. Play a fricken game at 30 then play it at 60, you will notice a difference.