Joined
·
3,393 Posts
One of the most widespread arguments towards prohibition, censure or intimidation of homosexuality is the notion that it is "against nature", an act that go against biological, functional and anatomical determinations.
Sure that argument makes sense if we take it into account with monogamy and reproduction as a single phenomenon. But, it not only is not the case, but strong physioanatomical evolutionary evidence also suggest that it is not neccessarily true.
Criterious and detailed analysis of products of defecation point toward the physiological structure of related organs. Their shape and consistence, together with their size and color when fresh, suggest that human recta are actually adapted, "projected" to fit the male reproductive organ.
This, coupled with the behavioral observation of animalia, comprising some creatures that presents, and others that doesn't, deep homology to the sapiens sapiens, further directs us to the idea that sexual acts among males are not only "natural", in lay terms, but also an evolutionary fact.
Groundbreaking advances in anthroplogical theory doesn't directly negate the original reproductive axioma, but suggest that it is correlated byproduct of human gregarious and societary nature. Something that is closely related to the origin of hunting groups, community and State.
Further observations would be wildly appreciated.
Sure that argument makes sense if we take it into account with monogamy and reproduction as a single phenomenon. But, it not only is not the case, but strong physioanatomical evolutionary evidence also suggest that it is not neccessarily true.
Criterious and detailed analysis of products of defecation point toward the physiological structure of related organs. Their shape and consistence, together with their size and color when fresh, suggest that human recta are actually adapted, "projected" to fit the male reproductive organ.
This, coupled with the behavioral observation of animalia, comprising some creatures that presents, and others that doesn't, deep homology to the sapiens sapiens, further directs us to the idea that sexual acts among males are not only "natural", in lay terms, but also an evolutionary fact.
Groundbreaking advances in anthroplogical theory doesn't directly negate the original reproductive axioma, but suggest that it is correlated byproduct of human gregarious and societary nature. Something that is closely related to the origin of hunting groups, community and State.
Further observations would be wildly appreciated.