First of all, my apologies for bringing this up again.
What gives you the right to close a thread which failed to be generally offensive or challenge the rules? The first thread aside, which BTW had flames starting from a moderator himself, I could see no reason why the other two were closed. Non-constructive? This isnt the Constructive-discussion sub-forum. There is a difference between pointless discussion and spam. Also closing a thread just because of anticipated conflict is pretty forceful, it was apparant to me that several other members did have legitimate things to say about the past and present. I would think it is only fair that you guys warn about impending flaming and closing it only if it gets out of hand - you dont amputate your hand when you contract rashes on your skin, you could clearly benefit from keeping it (extreme example I know
If it has come to a point where every thread in Emuforums has to have a legimate point and reason to exist, it is Emuforums who has changed. The closed threads were a direct highlight of the dicussions that took place before the first was closed. I guess years ago the Batard Vs. Maggots campaign should not have existed?
The point of this thread (as, for now, one seems necessary) is to provide contents for a complaint regarding the pattern of the moderation of the forums.
Sidenote: I did notice Reichfuher's apology regarding the aggressiveness. The above is merely what I intend to point out. I do however think that if Cloudvii's idioms innocently offend you, you only need to do nothing or inform him about it - there is no need to offend.