[skoreanime]

If any of you haven't heard yet, this years GG nominees are missing quite a few key figures.

The biggest one, the Dark Knight. It got nothing. Nothing at all.

And they wonder why viewership for it has been declining over the years...the council who decides the movies are washed up and can't get with the times

 

[Phil]

Wheres the hobbit?

 

[TheCloudOfSmoke]

The biggest one, the Dark Knight. It got nothing. Nothing at all.

I'm sorry if I am mistaken, but was it supposed to win something? oO

The movie wasn't ground breaking. :/

 

[snickothemule]

Award ceremonies by nature (at least to me) are a massive snooze fest. Every single award given by different people are done with such little care or such arse humour that it comes across as so labored. Now if they added some flare and some zazz to the show, it would make it worth watching. Like if say Tom Hanks gets an award they could go "and the golden globe goes to ............and he used to breed goldfish for a living........(crowd goes WTF?).......TOM HANKS!" That would make things interesting.

 

[Phil]

I'm sorry if I am mistaken, but was it supposed to win something? oO

The movie wasn't ground breaking. :/

Ledger made it was it was.....I guess the awards wouldn't let that slide...

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

agreed with TCOS, The Dark Knight wasn't anything special.

 

[skoreanime]

No it wasn't, but there was a reason why it was biggest grossing film of the year. Ledger and Oldman had pretty outstanding performances. A shame they didn't at least get a nomination

 

[azimov]

Overated movie is overated.