[Squall-Leonhart]

Bro, this baby runs fine on a single core Sempron 1250-LE.

Faster then Vista in every way, and DEP NEVER showed up.

Taht was Build 7000. 705x+ is supposed to be turbo in comparison

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

Vista sucks on laptops running 4200k drives.

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

actually.... personal testing the min requirements for Windows 7 are lower then Vista.

and if Vista was fast, Windows 7 705x WILL be faster xD

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

If that is the case, I refuse to use Windows 7 on the grounds that MS intends on keeping Wirth's law of software design alive, as thats the only way it can stay in business and be a driving force for PC hardware.

Don't like my view? Then frankly you can **** off.

thats preliminary requirements, anyone can easily see that the latest Window 7 builds can run on far weaker systems then Vista..

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

its probably screwing with the NT6 bootloader

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

You're searching the location for the drivers, instead of selecting them manually. It took me time to learn that annoying new difference in Vista's device management too.

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

.....not if they use directdraw

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

yup, x32 to x64 requires a fresh install.

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

i deleted it easily enough

just involves a fair amount of taking ownership and cmd prompt DEL

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

its not possible via a live cd or bartpe, it requires ntfs ownership changes and forcing the file to unlock.

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

You have to set windows to show all hidden and system files (and protected system files)

then take ownership of the bootloader folder (google ntfs ownership) then delete the contents using a combination of cmd prompt and a tool like unlocker assistant.

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

aww

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

sure

if she had a fat32 partition.

 

[Squall-Leonhart]

18 cool things Windows 7 does that Vista doesn't | News | TechRadar UK