Actually, it's worse with Dxbx, as we're not yet on the same level of API-hooking as Cxbx.
In short : Dxbx doesn't work yet.
And for anyone wondering: Yes, I'm still watching this project. No, I'm not actively participating. No, I don't know if or when I will pick it up once more.
But on the bright side : I still keep in touch with shadow_tj, and he's still working on Dxbx (although with short bursts, and on irregular intervals). There is also something else going on which might incite me to work in Dxbx once more - lets keep it at that for now. ;-)
In short : Dxbx doesn't work yet.
And for anyone wondering: Yes, I'm still watching this project. No, I'm not actively participating. No, I don't know if or when I will pick it up once more.
But on the bright side : I still keep in touch with shadow_tj, and he's still working on Dxbx (although with short bursts, and on irregular intervals). There is also something else going on which might incite me to work in Dxbx once more - lets keep it at that for now. ;-)
