Kaiser Sigma said:
Let's just hope that every rational man can be a little more objective and spare the world of their anti-religious thoughts...
Well, even the Vatican knows the answer, or else they wouldn't put the Pope on life support. At least they're wise enough not to trust prayers for anything concrete.
Anyway, it's not about my "anti-religious thoughts". Of all the scientific studies properly conducted, none found any healing effect for prayer. But maybe I'm just full of "anti-religious thoughts"
エッリー said:
You don't hate the Vatican, you hate everything related to religon whether it's good or bad.
Not
everything. I like most Buddhist teachings and the virtues it respects, despite them being religious.
I may have a strong opinion against religion (and mysticism in general; everything that is metaphysical, in fact), but that’s because I’ve adopted a ‘take-no-prisoners’ attitude towards it. I won’t accept false beliefs, or reason under false premises, not even for a second.
Dark Watcher said:
And for Excorcists...We are sure that a few put on quite a show, but we do not knock what cannot be explained spiritually (There are things that can occur that even Boltz cannot find an answer for). Needless to say we hope we never have the need for such ..er...services
Just because you cannot find an answer to something doesn't mean that it has a supernatural "explanation". In fact, this would be a simple case of arrogance (“oh, I don’t know what it is, so supernatural forces must be behind it”).
History has taught that there’s always an answer – but we are not always smart enough to find it (sometimes it took centuries before someone could explain certain features of our world).
It’s just like when primitive people saw lightning and heard the thunder, couldn’t think of an explanation for it and therefore assumed a supernatural “explanation” (e.g. a thunder god). Now we all know that lightning and thunder are all a result of static electricity and ionized air, and no one needs to postulate thunder gods anymore.
The same goes for those demonic possession cases. Even in the cases were a prosaic explanation is not immediately obvious, it doesn’t mean that there isn’t one – it just means that you’re not clever enough to find it. To claim otherwise is go against history and all evidence gathered thus far.
And I’m saying “you” in the general sense. It would apply to me in the cases where “not even Botz can find an answer for”. If I cannot find an answer for something, it doesn’t mean that there’s no answer – it just means that I’m not smart enough to figure it out. Take quantum gravity, for instance. I don’t know the answer to this conundrum, but this is not because there’s no answer – it’s because I’m not smart enough to find it
EDIT: As for the Pope, I’ve never respected him in the first place. Religious leaders are always suspicious for me. But I’ve lost any respect I had for his as a human being the moment he said that death and suffering are good for us. Anyone who advocates death and suffering loses any respect in my eyes. There’s a moral imperative for us to stop all this involuntary death and suffering, and I don’t care if someone else’s god seems to think otherwise.