Posts by D.D.
1 - 7 of 92 Posts
Joined
·
5,270 Posts
hmm...i think the thing is, Square has agreed to develop for gamecube as well. what FF game did that get? FF:Chronicles, which isnt considered a "real" FF game. Many ppl are thinking the same thing will happen with [email protected]#[email protected]~, since the only game promised right now i think is FFXI, which isnt really "the next Final Fantasy". At least with the PS3, FF fans will have a guarantee for one or more true successors to the FF Series.
i also dont get where ppl are being misguided either...square clearly said that they have no plans of making a remake. i think its the same with what they did for ps2, where they said "look at this demo (FFVIII) being rendered in realtime....it'll only get better". at least no one who has posted in this thread so far has been deceived.
i also dont get where ppl are being misguided either...square clearly said that they have no plans of making a remake. i think its the same with what they did for ps2, where they said "look at this demo (FFVIII) being rendered in realtime....it'll only get better". at least no one who has posted in this thread so far has been deceived.
Joined
·
5,270 Posts
Joined
·
5,270 Posts
ah, ic. well i guess theres always ppl that believe in what companies say and other ppl that dont. nowadays, none of these companies really keep their word anyway so anything can happen. for all we know, xbox360 mite actually get more than 1 FF title, Halo3 mite go to ps3, and FFVII could see a remake...
as for FFXI being a true Final Fantasy title, i wud say technically speaking i have no problem agreeing with u there. but i believe gamers also look at something called gameplay (i think thats what its called) when talking about games....hmmm.
Joined
·
5,270 Posts
that guy makes lots of sense. i like how hes talking bout downloading games and such. he has a bunch of good points, some are kinda .... pointless...some are stupid....
but....hearing him say "exboxthreesixty" just isnt as smooth as...peeessthree >_<. also, that one point that he brought up about xbox being the primary platform even for multiplatform games? i agree, but for a different reason. i think someone here on the boards mentioned that multiplatform games of this gen were designed for the lowest/weakest machine (most ppl wud say PS2 but really its a question of what ur talking about...). id say the same for next gen wud happen only xbox360 is at the bottom this time...
i for one always thot it wud be obvious that ps3 would be cheaper/easier to develop for
but....hearing him say "exboxthreesixty" just isnt as smooth as...peeessthree >_<. also, that one point that he brought up about xbox being the primary platform even for multiplatform games? i agree, but for a different reason. i think someone here on the boards mentioned that multiplatform games of this gen were designed for the lowest/weakest machine (most ppl wud say PS2 but really its a question of what ur talking about...). id say the same for next gen wud happen only xbox360 is at the bottom this time...
i for one always thot it wud be obvious that ps3 would be cheaper/easier to develop for
Joined
·
5,270 Posts
because the ps2 was always said to be extremely difficult to program for and because sony wud have to be really stupid if they didnt look to fixing that with the ps3.
EDIT:
on a sidenote i think u didnt realize i was replying to katsuya's post...
judging a console/company on the basis of sequels is quite funny actually. saying that "sony" is responsible for these evil sequels and "MS" is responsible for being original is even funnier i guess. piggy's post gave me good laffs
EDIT:
on a sidenote i think u didnt realize i was replying to katsuya's post...
judging a console/company on the basis of sequels is quite funny actually. saying that "sony" is responsible for these evil sequels and "MS" is responsible for being original is even funnier i guess. piggy's post gave me good laffs
1 - 7 of 92 Posts
