[Gk1986]

What's the best *free* program I can get to convert .wav files into .mp3 s?

 

[Bgnome]

all you need is a codec. i think winamp can do it but im not sure.
i use cdex to rip cds. its free.

 

[Gk1986]

Originally posted by Bgnome
all you need is a codec. i think winamp can do it but im not sure.
i use cdex to rip cds. its free.

I used Easy CDA Extractor, but it's crap. Thanks. You Da Gnome

 

[Betamax]

Yes winamp can do it. Download the mp3 output plugin from www.winamp.com . As for codecs check out www.digital-digest.com (links to both video and audio codecs are available)

 

[Gk1986]

Originally posted by Betamax
Yes winamp can do it. Download the mp3 output plugin from www.winamp.com . As for codecs check out www.digital-digest.com (links to both video and audio codecs are available)

thanks. What would I do without my daily dosage of emuforum help? :heh:

 

[Xeven]

seek theraphy! go to your shrink Gk! :evil:

 

[Gk1986]

Originally posted by Xeven
seek theraphy! go to your shrink Gk! :evil:

I've been counting...6 posts and we're off topic :wink:...here's a theorem for the board. Hold your applause until the end:

The Off-Topic Theorem (as proposed by Gk)

Gk1986(online) + Xeven(online) = Off-topic(any thread)

 

[Betamax]

Techically It's not a theorem until it has been mathematically proven to be true.

 

[Gk1986]

Originally posted by Betamax
Techically It's not a theorem until it has been mathematically proven to be true.

Gk + 7 = Off-Topic. Therefore Gk-Off-Topic = Xeven. What further proof do you need? Plus, this makes more sense than CPCTC.

 

[Bgnome]

Originally posted by Gk1986
Gk + 7 = Off-Topic. Therefore Gk-Off-Topic = Xeven. What further proof do you need? Plus, this makes more sense than CPCTC.

well, it could be a postulate if you cant prove it wrong, or a hypothesis if there just isnt enough evidence yet

 

[Death Metal]

Originally posted by Bgnome


well, it could be a postulate if you cant prove it wrong, or a hypothesis if there just isnt enough evidence yet

OK: Xeven and Gk are online togheter, right now. That may clear some doubts people were having

 

[Xeven]

were online together? no were not.. we're continents apart! :evil:

 

[Death Metal]

Originally posted by Xeven
were online together? no were not.. we're continents apart! :evil:

Funny as always

 

[Gk1986]

Originally posted by Bgnome


well, it could be a postulate if you cant prove it wrong, or a hypothesis if there just isnt enough evidence yet

I know, but theorem just sounds so much better Plus, who cares about math?.... ... ... :heh:


BTW BGnome
I got nominated by my school to attend that summer camp thingy with the other schools in Georgia. One person from each high school. That means I won't be here for six weeks in the summer...I shudder to think about my average post count afterword...

 

[Betamax]

Ok letsee now:-

Base case:
Trivally :
gk(0) + xeven(0) = ot (0)

ie if neither is present then there is no chance that the thread will be made OT by their influence.

n+1 case:
gk(n+1) + xeven(n+1) = Ot(n+1)

but as gk always replies to xeven:
gk(n+1) = xeven +1

similarly for xeven :

xeven(n+1) = gk +1

now we have

gk + xeven + 2 = OT (n+1)

but

OT (n+1) = OT - 2

As an OT post will always genrate a response from both the inital poster and the recipent.

Hence proven by induction


(man I need more sleep)

 

[Xeven]

don't worry i'll be here to take your spot! :evil: .. i hope.. :heh:

 

[Gk1986]

>beta
but the bases are different, and in order to use logarithem, you must either change all the base to 10 or in this case, gk, xeven, or ot, or use another approach (eg 2logGk+2logXeven=1logOT). I need to review my Precal notes...

>Xev
I'm suer :wink:

 

[Betamax]

Ah. I assumed that the were basic functions. (but then again there's nothing basic or functional in OT is there )

 

[Gk1986]

Originally posted by Betamax
Ah. I assumed that the were basic functions. (but then again there's nothing basic or functional in OT is there )

OT is just one of those weird numbers (like e or pi)

 

[Xeven]

so what's the value in what unit? :evil: