Well, trying to keep my dismay out of the way in my judgement of the PS2, I belive that the graphics from A GeForce2 are superior to the graphics in the PS2. To do an acurate comparison of power, you need to set your video card to 640x480x32bpp. What i do for comparison is use my GeForce2 tv-out feature to see the diffrence. I have been able to convince my Playstaton-loving-pc-smashing-videoit friend that games do look better with a pc than the PS2. But i guess that is mostly opinion.
But for a spec by spec comparison:
PS2:
147.456MHz RAMDAC
4MB VRAM
48 GB per second memory bandwith
2.4 Gpixels per second
25 million polygons per second
GeForce2:
350MHz RAMDAC
32/64/128MB VRAM
7.36GB/Sec Memory Bandwidth
1 Billion Pixels/Sec Rendering Power
31 million polygons per second
As you can see, both have advantages over one another, but the bottom line is polygons per seconds, and of course, the GeForce 2 takes the prize.
XboX on the other hand, is supposed to have a more advanced version of the GeForce3. But i will belive it when i see it.
NINTENDO ROCKS THE HOUSE!!!!
But for a spec by spec comparison:
PS2:
147.456MHz RAMDAC
4MB VRAM
48 GB per second memory bandwith
2.4 Gpixels per second
25 million polygons per second
GeForce2:
350MHz RAMDAC
32/64/128MB VRAM
7.36GB/Sec Memory Bandwidth
1 Billion Pixels/Sec Rendering Power
31 million polygons per second
As you can see, both have advantages over one another, but the bottom line is polygons per seconds, and of course, the GeForce 2 takes the prize.
XboX on the other hand, is supposed to have a more advanced version of the GeForce3. But i will belive it when i see it.
NINTENDO ROCKS THE HOUSE!!!!