The Official Benchmark and Comparison Thread! - Page 3

General Plot · July 17th, 2005, 22:59

In a challenge up against an Athlon XP 3000+, I came close (about a second difference in the results). My 2 year old P4 is still a force to be reckoned with, but no where near as much as cooliscool's.

I wonder how a Pentium Extreme does in this test, anyone have one that can benchmark it? I'm really curious to see how it would do. Or a P4E. SuperPI 1M calculation in 48.313 seconds. @ dukenukem: what are you running? A time of 6 minutes 26 seconds seems quite slow. O.o
Update: that fr-025 demo score is 10214. GPU is definitely my bottleneck (I knew that already, just didn't think it was THAT bad, meh).

Attached Images

	screen shot.JPG (142.5 KB, 34 views)
	1.JPG (5.9 KB, 15 views)

__________________

Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.4 Ghz | 6 GB DDR3 RAM in Triple Channel | GeForce GTX 285
2.5 TB Hard Drive Space | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Official betatester of PCSX2

Last edited by General Plot; July 17th, 2005 at 23:16..

**cooliscool** · July 17th, 2005, 23:24

He's running a Celeron 533 HP box.

How he makes due with that carp, I'll never know.

Anyway, I got 41506 pop.stones.

Attached Images

Clipboard01.jpg (5.7 KB, 11 views)

__________________

Last edited by cooliscool; July 17th, 2005 at 23:31..

General Plot · July 18th, 2005, 00:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooliscool

He's running a Celeron 533 HP box.

How he makes due with that carp, I'll never know.

Anyway, I got 41506 pop.stones.

I thought it might be the guy from that other forum (the tech talk one). Now I feel even worse for him.

__________________

Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.4 Ghz | 6 GB DDR3 RAM in Triple Channel | GeForce GTX 285
2.5 TB Hard Drive Space | Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Official betatester of PCSX2

iceKING · July 18th, 2005, 01:05

Haven't really benched my new machine much, but I got 47096 pop.stones with my A64 at 2.4GHz and the 6800nu (fully unlocked) at 350/700MHz.

(This was with performance settings in the nv control panel I think.)

Attached Images

popstones.jpg (8.3 KB, 10 views)

DC_daNMan · July 18th, 2005, 02:41

Well, we all know that the 7800GTX's are quicker than the 6800U's. But just how much quicker? Fortunately, My PC is similar in spec to that of ChrisRay's (except in RAM and GFX, and sound). I got these 2 6800U's about a month or so before the 7800GTX's came out. How annoyed was I :S

PC spec:
AMD Athlon64 3800+ (venice core)
2gb corsair RAM
2 x 6800U's (In SLI, of course)
Enermax noisetaker 600W
2 x 160gb HD's in RAID0
1 x 200gb HD
Windows is on a 40gb HD

I think thats everything importent..
I was considering (and could quite well do) a dual SLI system. Yes, dual SLI. How? you ask me? Well, I have 2 voodoo2's here right now.. but I would forefit my other PCI slots which are in use atm.. Heh

One other thing, that was done at 1024 by 768. Chris, what res did you have it on?

Attached Images

bench.PNG (95.1 KB, 76 views)

GeneralClaymore · July 18th, 2005, 18:28

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1296075530 75193 aquamarks

__________________
Gateway FPD2185W 21"HD LCD

ChrisRay · July 19th, 2005, 06:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by DC_daNMan

Well, we all know that the 7800GTX's are quicker than the 6800U's. But just how much quicker? Fortunately, My PC is similar in spec to that of ChrisRay's (except in RAM and GFX, and sound). I got these 2 6800U's about a month or so before the 7800GTX's came out. How annoyed was I :S

PC spec:
AMD Athlon64 3800+ (venice core)
2gb corsair RAM
2 x 6800U's (In SLI, of course)
Enermax noisetaker 600W
2 x 160gb HD's in RAID0
1 x 200gb HD
Windows is on a 40gb HD

I think thats everything importent..
I was considering (and could quite well do) a dual SLI system. Yes, dual SLI. How? you ask me? Well, I have 2 voodoo2's here right now.. but I would forefit my other PCI slots which are in use atm.. Heh

One other thing, that was done at 1024 by 768. Chris, what res did you have it on?

All my benches are done at the default 1024x768. Your score seems a little low. I get 19,300 with dual 6800GTS in this rig. Do you have AA/AF enabled in that benchmark? You should be getting about 20,000.

Running 2 Voodoo2's seem kinda silly to me. The few glide games that may be an issue should work with a glide wrapper and I cant see the benefit of using glide at all these days.

http://www.ngemu.com/forums/showpost...11&postcount=2

This post was done with my Dual 6800GTS. 19,323

http://www.ngemu.com/forums/attachme...chmentid=94226

This was done with my Dual 7800GTX. 26,496

I guess I should update my original posts with my old specifications.

__________________
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.4 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLIMonitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1050 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

Nzone
SLI Forum Administrator
Nvidia User Group Member

Last edited by ChrisRay; July 19th, 2005 at 06:21..

DC_daNMan · July 19th, 2005, 09:01

The voodoo's are just for show, chris :P
And let me see about the score..

**Rudy_x** · July 19th, 2005, 09:31

www.x-homepage.nl <--- put up some benchmark like 3dmark , Super PI, HExus

(look under my pc :P)

__________________
Betatester of: Pcsx2

DC_daNMan · July 19th, 2005, 09:51

Ah well, after fiddling around at the bios screen for a while.. I noticed the CAS timing was at 2.5 when it should of been at 3 (I should invest in better memory, anyway). Here is the result now.

Attached Images

bench2.PNG (17.0 KB, 23 views)

**cooliscool** · July 19th, 2005, 12:04

Um.. highering CAS latency won't make scores better, it if anything, would make them worse.

However, 3DMark 03 is such a GPU whore, your other system details make no difference in your score. You must have done something else.

__________________

ChrisRay · July 19th, 2005, 13:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by DC_daNMan

The voodoo's are just for show, chris :P
And let me see about the score..

Seems like a waiste of power to me. They'd be better off on display. Your CAS Latency wouldnt really made much of a difference with the exception of GT1. I have a feeling you had a borked SLI run. Which rarely happens but causes strange performance figures.

20k seems about right for a 6800 Ultra SLI setup.

__________________
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.4 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLIMonitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1050 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

Nzone
SLI Forum Administrator
Nvidia User Group Member

DC_daNMan · July 19th, 2005, 21:05

Hmm, let me try repeating the test with CAS timings of 2.5 and 3. The RAM i have is rated at 3, and I know a lower timing is better than a higher one. But from the way everything has increased in speed in general, I think it was this that was the problem.. Just formatted, so need to d/l 3dmark again. But I'll post here as soon as its done.

EDIT: Ok, weird. Im now getting higher scores just in general. More than likely because I have just formatted. As for the CAS timings.. There seems to be no diffrence afterall.. Maybe your right, chris. As for the voodoo2's.. Im gonna have them in at one point. How leet would a dual sli set up be? Hehe. Ok, so there would be no performace gain, and a single 6800U could do about 200 times better than the 2 cards.. but if PC's were just about performace, Why then do we have coloured case fans, side windows and and that god damn DFI lan party mobo?

the first one is CAS timing of 3, the second, of 2.5. As you can see, almost no diffrence.

Attached Images

	bench1.PNG (22.2 KB, 20 views)
	bench2.PNG (22.1 KB, 16 views)

Last edited by DC_daNMan; July 19th, 2005 at 21:35..

Silvestre · August 14th, 2005, 03:05

3DMark05
3DMark03
3DMark2001
Aquamark3
PCMark2005

__________________

Hannibal · August 18th, 2005, 02:38

3D Mark 05 Score 4799 (free version settings)

AMD XP 3000
512 MB (PC 2700)
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT

Last edited by Hannibal; August 18th, 2005 at 02:53..

OminaeYu · September 3rd, 2005, 20:40

3DMark01 - 12,457
3DMark03 - 7,268
3DMark05 - 3,097
Aquamark3 - 40,113
fr-025: the.popular.demo @ 1024x768 & quality 3 - 22,484 Pop Stones
Counterstrike Video Stress Test - 61.26 FPS

Attached Images

	3DMark2k1.jpg (76.2 KB, 4 views)
	3DMark2k3.jpg (46.2 KB, 4 views)
	3DMark2k5.jpg (46.8 KB, 7 views)
	Aquamark3.jpg (287.6 KB, 7 views)
	CSVST.jpg (37.8 KB, 7 views)

__________________

| CPU: Intel Core i5 2500k @ 4.5GHz | Motherboard: ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 | GPU: Gigabyte GTX 670 |
| Memory: G.SKILL Sniper Series 8GB DDR3 @ 1866MHz Dual Channel | Monitor: Acer P215H 21.5" 1080p LCD | Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium x64 |

Syed Fawad · September 24th, 2005, 14:06

Well, I am not a really big PC gamer but I tend to jump to the PC boat during the "console transition" period. My system is in my sig and I managed 50,637 points on Aquamark at its standard test. Also, I got some 98FPS on the CS source stress test.

Attached Images

	Fawad Aquamark.JPG (98.2 KB, 10 views)
	Fawad CS Source Stress.JPG (38.4 KB, 4 views)

__________________

Asus K8N (nForce3)
AMD64 3000+ (754)
768MB DDR 400MHz (PC 3200)
nVidia Geforce 6600GT 128MB (AGP)

Aquamark3 - 53,000

"Good friends mustn't always be together. It is the feeling of oneness when distant that proves a lasting friendship"

**n_w95482** · October 15th, 2005, 07:03

Benchies with my "new" PC ^_^. Listed in order are...:

3DMark 2001SE
3DMark 2003
3DMark 2005
AquaMark3
PCMark 2004
PCMark 2005
fr-025: the.popular.demo

Using the 78.01 ForceWare drivers from nVidia's site with the graphics optimizations in the control panel disabled. The card overclocks the core automatically to 491 MHz whenever any game is run. I'm not sure why it does that

. I'll do some more tests later

.

Attached Images

	2001.png (69.0 KB, 1 views)
	2003.png (16.0 KB, 5 views)
	2005.png (16.4 KB, 3 views)
	am3.jpg (40.8 KB, 6 views)
	pc04.png (16.1 KB, 5 views)
	pc05.png (15.6 KB, 3 views)
	tpd.png (4.4 KB, 2 views)

__________________
Later.

ChrisRay · October 15th, 2005, 11:13

Your core isnt running @ 491 mhz. Thats only the vertex engine. The 7800GTX has seperate clock domains for its rops/shader units/vertex engine. Thats just how rivatuner reports it.

__________________
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.4 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLIMonitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1050 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

Nzone
SLI Forum Administrator
Nvidia User Group Member

**n_w95482** · October 17th, 2005, 07:12

That's odd, I've never heard of any other card doing that. Does the 6 series do it as well? If I were to overclock the card, does it move each frequency up equally?

__________________
Later.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

July 18th, 2005, 18:28	#46
GeneralClaymore Computer Nerd Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: MI.Det Posts: 162	http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1296075530 75193 aquamarks __________________ Gateway FPD2185W 21"HD LCD \|A64 X2 3800+ @ 2.7ghz\|DFI Lanparty UT NF4 SLi-D \|Forton source 500watts 24pin\|2x1GB mushkin pc3200\|Sappire X1900xt 256mb 661/900(1800)\|400GB Maxtor HD sata\| XFI Xtreme music \|logitech 5300e 5.1 \|eDimensional Audio FX Headsets\| Logitech G7 Gaming mouse

July 19th, 2005, 09:01	#48
DC_daNMan Evading Death +the Taxman Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: GMT +0 Posts: 330	The voodoo's are just for show, chris :P And let me see about the score..

July 19th, 2005, 09:31	#49
Rudy_x Registered User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Netherlands Posts: 350	www.x-homepage.nl <--- put up some benchmark like 3dmark , Super PI, HExus (look under my pc :P) __________________ Betatester of: Pcsx2

July 19th, 2005, 12:04	#51
cooliscool Global Moderator Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: SC, USA Posts: 7,231	Um.. highering CAS latency won't make scores better, it if anything, would make them worse. However, 3DMark 03 is such a GPU whore, your other system details make no difference in your score. You must have done something else. __________________

August 14th, 2005, 03:05	#54
Silvestre Novice Overclocker Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Germany, Hnvr Posts: 57	3DMark05 3DMark03 3DMark2001 Aquamark3 PCMark2005 __________________

August 18th, 2005, 02:38	#55
Hannibal Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Earth Posts: 159	3D Mark 05 Score 4799 (free version settings) AMD XP 3000 512 MB (PC 2700) NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT Last edited by Hannibal; August 18th, 2005 at 02:53..

October 15th, 2005, 11:13	#59
ChrisRay MMORPG Junkie Join Date: May 2004 Location: No Where! Posts: 1,146	Your core isnt running @ 491 mhz. Thats only the vertex engine. The 7800GTX has seperate clock domains for its rops/shader units/vertex engine. Thats just how rivatuner reports it. __________________ \|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.4 Ghz\|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer \|Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333\|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLIMonitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1050 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080 \|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz\|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A\|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800\| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI Nzone SLI Forum Administrator Nvidia User Group Member

October 17th, 2005, 07:12	#60
n_w95482 Gone Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: California Posts: 6,336	That's odd, I've never heard of any other card doing that. Does the 6 series do it as well? If I were to overclock the card, does it move each frequency up equally? __________________ Later.