About this "Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs)"
 

Well I wanted to check this option out, because since noticing that there is the same option on Pete's CDR plugin 1.2, I unchecked the "Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs)" in Pete's D3D 1.49 GPU plugin. So I Though that I could get a better resolution in the mdec's (without those pixel's that show sometimes). So here's the configuration;

And here's pic 1;

Then I notice that the mdec's resolution weren't that great and I went back to checking; Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs);
In which it came out better than before;

I just want to ask this, when unchecking the Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs), is it suppose to have that weird color combonation in "pic 1", or should it have a better and higher resolution?:confused:

I also notice this when unchecking "Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs)";

I know that when unchecking "Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs)", the mdec's resolution come out bad, but the text's come out smooth, which is nice:) . But when checking the "Unfiltered framebuffer updates (faster mdecs)", you could see the pixels from the text, like for example in here;

when you are doing 'unfiltered mdecs' in the d3d plugins,
they will not use a filtered texture, but a d3d surface, which is
faster on many cards.

Funny enuff nVidia drivers will filter a stretched surface automatically,
so it gets filtered, too...

when you are not doing the 'unfiltered' option, a filtered texture in the
same quality as you have selected in the gpu config will be used for
the mdec... and you are using 4-4-4-4 textures, so you will get a
bad quality.

So if I do it in 8-8-8-8 textures, will it turn out better?

not if 32bit colour plate helps, also one might expreience performance hit
sure, they are looks nicer then the one you have

Wait wait, say that again. I didn't understand what you said:confused:

I just what to know that, will we get a better resolution in the mdec's in the future.:)